ALIO:Devolution succeeds in Mandera but weak leadership, graft persist

The recent remarks by former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua on the admission of Grade 10 students to national schools — particularly his emphasis on perceived exclusion of the Mt Kenya region — have reignited a sensitive national debate on education equity and regional balance.

While such concerns deserve sober discussion, the framing and tone adopted risk deepening regional antagonism rather than advancing constructive solutions.

Once again, the Northeastern region finds itself drawn into a national conversation characterised more by political symbolism than policy substance.

Any serious analysis of Kenya’s education landscape must begin with historical context. The majority of national schools in central Kenya were established along the East Africa Railway line long before and Independence, largely through collaboration with colonial administrators, missionary activity and strong local community mobilisation.

These institutions were built in an era when northern Kenya was deliberately referred to as the “Closed Districts” marginalised under colonial and post-Independence governance frameworks that restricted movement, investment and access to social services. The disparities we see today are therefore not accidental; they are the product of long-standing structural exclusion.

It was against this background that the clamour for a new constitutional dispensation finally yielded results with the promulgation of the 2010 Constitution.

Devolution was re-introduced in 2013, rightly hailed as a transformative moment for historically marginalised regions. Since then, northern Kenya counties have received hundreds of billions of shillings through equitable share allocations, in addition to CDF resources and donor-funded programmes.

These investments were intended to close historical gaps in education, health and infrastructure.

More than a decade into devolution, great progress and outcomes on the ground are felt, especially in Mandera county, though the functions of national and county governments are distinct and complement each other, as provided in Schedule 4 of the Constitution.

Across in northern Kenya, Mandera county has made great progress by fully developing medical, teachers and training colleges comparable to institutions elsewhere in the country.

Kudos to Governor Mohamed Khalif for his commitment and focus on services. At the same time, the county has provided bursaries and scholarships to all students in the three institutions, enabling graduates to prepare for the labour markets locally, nationally, regionally and internationally.

At this juncture, it is no longer enough to attribute failures to historical marginalisation. A candid assessment points to serious governance deficits at the local level. The promise of devolution has been undermined by weak leadership, corruption, politicisation of development priorities, mushrooming of villages and settlements, the persistence of negative ethnicity and clan-based patronage systems.

This reality does not absolve national leaders of responsibility as education is largely a national government function. Education policy must be grounded in equity, merit and deliberate affirmative investment in under-served regions.

Nor does it justify rhetoric that appears to pit regions against each other for political gain. National cohesion cannot be built by amplifying grievances without addressing governance failures across all regions.

Equally, leaders from marginalised areas must resist the temptation to weaponise historical injustice as a perpetual defence against present-day accountability. Devolution was not designed to replace centralised marginalisation with decentralised mismanagement. Its success depends on ethical leadership, good governance, institutional capacity and active citizen oversight.

Kenya’s education system should be a platform for social integration and shared national identity. Admission to national schools must therefore reflect both fairness and intentional capacity-building where gaps exist. This requires investment, policy coherence and leadership that prioritises long-term national interest over short-term political mobilisation.

Ultimately, the challenge facing Kenya is not merely one of resource allocation, but of leadership quality and civic responsibility. Honest national dialogue — grounded in evidence, history and accountability — is the only path toward addressing inequality without breeding hate and resentment. The Kenya child from Fikow in Mandera or  Kikuyu in Kiambu whose futures depend on these institutions deserve more than political theatre; they deserve results.