The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) has dismissed as false and misleading reports linking its officers to the alleged interception of a vehicle at the Uganda border and confiscation of election-related materials.
The DCI said the reports claimed that three occupants of the vehicle were questioned and that the incident was linked to alleged electoral malpractice involving voter registration materials.
The Directorate said the reports also alleged that a DCI officer was investigating the matter and had been warned to abandon the investigation or face transfer before being moved to DCI Headquarters.
“These allegations are false, inaccurate and wholly without foundation. There is no such officer, no such arrest as portrayed and no such transfer linked to any electoral investigation as described in the report. The publication is therefore misleading,” the DCI said in a statement.
The DCI raised concern over the timing of the report as the country begins preparations for the 2027 General Election.
It also said the institution was not allowed to respond to the allegations before they were aired and published.
The DCI reiterated its commitment to supporting a free, fair, transparent and credible electoral process.
“Responsible journalism on matters of national security and electoral integrity requires verification and an opportunity for the institution concerned to respond. The Directorate will continue to discharge its mandate professionally, impartially and strictly in accordance with the Constitution and the law,” it said.
The Directorate added that no DCI officer is above the law and that no officer is instructed to abandon a lawful investigation.
It urged media houses and journalists to observe high standards of responsibility and professionalism when reporting on sensitive electoral and security matters.
“Verification of facts before publication is essential to public confidence in institutions and to the integrity of the electoral process,” the DCI said.
The Directorate said it would formally register its concern with the relevant statutory bodies mandated to uphold media standards and accountability, while respecting the constitutional guarantee of media freedom.
The public was advised to treat the report as unfounded.
