MPs in session at Parliament Buildings




MPs elected in the 2027 general election could easily face citizen’s wrath with the electoral commission proposing sweeping changes to the country’s recall law.

The proposed Election Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 has lowered the threshold for initiating petitions recalling Senators, Women Reps and Members of the National Assembly.

The amendments proposed by Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission  (IEBC) removes legal hurdles that frustrated past recall attempts.

At the height of the 2024 anti-Finance Bill protests, angry Kenyans sought to recall several MPs but were frustrated by the absence of a clear legal framework and a cumbersome recall process.

Nairobi Woman Representative Esther Passaris was also targeted following her proposed anti-demos law.

ODM threatened to initiate recall against its six MPs that voted in support of the Finance Bill of 2024.

They included Elisha Odhiambo (Gem), Gideon Ochanda (Bondo), Caroli Omondi (Suba South), Emmanuel Wangwe (Navakholo), Memusi Kanchory (Kajiado Central), and Bernard Shinali (Ikolomani).

One of the biggest changes being dropped in the new law is that a sitting MP could only be recalled by voters only after a High Court judgment confirming violation of Chapter Six of the constitution or is convicted of graft.

In the proposed changes, a voter may begin the recall process on grounds of incompetence.

Other grounds are gross violation of the constitution or any other law, gross misconduct or conviction an offence punishable by imprisonment for at least six months.

Ironically, it’s MPs who will either approve or reject the amendments. MPs have previously shot down public interest legislation for their own self-preservation.

“A recall under subsection… shall only be initiated within a period of 24 months after the election of the Member of Parliament and not later than 12 of Parliament and months immediately preceding the next general election,” part of the proposed amendments reads in part.

“A recall petition shall not be filed against a Member of Parliament more than once during the term of that member in Parliament.”

In the proposed changes, IEBC says the petition to recall an MP should be backed by at least 30 per cent of registered voters.

“The list of names referred to in subsection (2)(b) shall contain the names, address, national identity card number or passport number and signature of the voters supporting the petition,” the suggested amendments states.

The current law says such a petition should have the backing of at least 15 per cent of the voters in more than half of the wards in the county or the constituency.

The current law also barred unsuccessful MP contestants from initiating recall proceedings.

It is also required that a recall election generate more than 50 per cent turnout in the affected constituency.

But that has been changed in the bill which IEBC has published for public participation before sending it to Parliament.

It simplifies the petition process saying it’ll be initiated by any registered voter in the constituency.

It lowers the threshold for the vote to 30 per cent and with the process, including the election, to be conducted within five months.

Petitioners would thus only need signatures from at least 30 per cent of registered voters in the affected constituency or county.

The changes come barely three years after the country witnessed an unprecedented campaign to recall MPs.

Citizens launched online campaigns to mobilise signatures against several MPs, especially those who supported the controversial Finance Bill, 2024.

Several MPs became targets of grassroots and online recall campaigns because they voted in favour of the Finance Bill.

Some also publicly apologised to constituents after intense backlash.

The efforts were, however, marred by legal obstacles.

IEBC said the constitutional right of recall lacked an operational legal framework following court decisions.

This was tested recently in court where Justice Roselyne Aburili held that she couldn’t compel IEBC to process petitions seeking recall of MPs.

Justice Aburili said the petitions were premature because Parliament was yet to complete the legislation guiding the process.

“The petitioners as well as the court should let Parliament legislate and wait for the outcome,” she said in the matter.

The petition was filed after IEBC declined to initiate the process of recalling Tharaka Nithi Senator Mwenda Gataya.

A 2017 case by Katiba Institute invalidated several sections of the Elections Act governing recall of MPs.

Article 104 of the constitution gives voters the right to recall a Member of Parliament before the expiry of the term.

At the height of the calls, IEBC cited court decisions that affected the existing law, and the wave of petitions subsided.

Observers also cited the requirement for a prior High Court determination as one of the biggest barriers.

The new bill seeks to change that.

If enacted, voters would initiate the process directly, subject to the statutory grounds and the signature threshold.

The proposal is also likely to influence how MPs conduct themselves after the 2027 general election.

Recall campaigns could follow over unpopular decisions, broken campaign promises or conduct that voters consider unacceptable.

The reforms, however, are likely to generate debate.

If enacted, the law would send a clear message to those seeking election in 2027.

Winning an election would no longer guarantee five uninterrupted years in office.

An MP who loses the confidence of constituents could face an organised campaign to remove them long before returning to the ballot.