Governors have suffered
a major setback in their push to borrow independently from financial markets, as
does the national government, without the oversight of the National Treasury.
Senators rejected a
request by county bosses, arguing that direct borrowing could expose counties
to reckless debt accumulation.
Counties face pending
bills exceeding Sh150 billion, as well as unpaid overdrafts with commercial
banks running into millions of shillings.
Last week, Council of
Governors Vice chairman Muthomi Njuki and CoG Finance Committee chairman Fernandes
Barasa appeared before the Senate Finance and Budget Committee to argue their
case for independent borrowing.
Enjoying this article?
Subscribe for unlimited access to premium sports coverage.
“The council proposes
the Senate initiates establishment of a threshold for county governments’
borrowing entitlements pursuant to Section 50(5) of the Public Finance
Management (PFM) Act,” Njuki and Barasa told the committee.
Currently, counties
cannot borrow directly from lenders without the Treasury acting as guarantor.
The PFM Act mandates the national government
to guarantee and manage borrowing for state entities, including counties, to
ensure fiscal prudence.
Section 50(1) requires
the government to meet financing needs at the lowest market cost while keeping
public debt sustainable.
Further, Section 50(5)
allows Parliament to set borrowing thresholds for both national and county
governments.
Barasa argued that
counties should be allowed more autonomy under strict guidelines.
“The CoG proposes that
the Senate invokes section 50(2c) of the PFM Act to explain measures being
taken to ensure thresholds are met and that high debt stress risks are managed
within the medium term,” he said.
However, the committee,
chaired by Mandera Senator Ali Roba, immediately rejected the proposal.
The lawmakers warned
that direct borrowing could unleash a wave of financial mismanagement.
“Very few governors have
the instruments or ability to borrow responsibly in international markets,”
Migori Senator Eddy Oketch said.
“Opening this window
could be disastrous,” he said.
Senator Roba echoed
concerns over “immaturity” in county financial management. “We have cases where
successive governors abandon projects or reject pending bills left by their
predecessors,” he said.
“What happens if we
allow counties to borrow directly? Debts may be abandoned, creating messy and
costly outcomes. It would be a ticking time bomb,” he warned.
Despite the rejection, Njuki
tried to persuade senators, insisting that counties would act responsibly.
“If we borrowed, it
would be our responsibility to pay. We would work overtime to meet the
obligations,” he said, urging lawmakers not to discriminate against counties.
Currently, most counties
rely on commercial bank overdrafts to cover urgent operations, including
salaries, when exchequer releases are delayed.
Direct access to loans,
Njuki argued, would allow counties to plan and execute development projects
more efficiently without constant Treasury intervention.
However, senators
remained firm that loosening borrowing rules could expose counties — and the national
economy — to unnecessary risk.
They stressed that
without proper capacity and financial discipline, direct access to
international loans could lead to unsustainable debt levels, project
abandonment, and long-term fiscal instability.
Instant analysis
Standoff underscores
ongoing tension between counties seeking financial autonomy and national
lawmakers prioritising oversight and fiscal prudence. Governors say borrowing
independence will accelerate development but senators say current safeguards
essential to protect public resources. For now, counties will continue to rely
on Treasury-backed borrowing and short-term overdrafts, keeping ultimate fiscal
control at the national level. County leaders pledge to push for greater autonomy
in parliamentary sessions.
Comments 0
Sign in to join the conversation
Sign In Create AccountNo comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!