Behind the smiles at public events, tension is building between a county chief and a wealthy businessman who was once among his strongest financial backers. Insiders claim their relationship possibly turned sour after disagreements over appointments and access to lucrative opportunities. The businessman is now said to be allegedly entertaining the county boss's political rivals. Our mole whispers that the fallout could become a major headache as both sides possess damaging information about each other's past dealings.
***
A first-term senator has suddenly become the talk of town. Why? He has been allegedly flaunting his proximity to the powers that be which is not there. The lawmaker is said to have supposedly convinced a potential rival to drop his bid after promising to secure him a lucrative commission appointment. But things recently went south when another person landed the position. Feeling betrayed, the rival, who commands a considerable following, has now purportedly declared political war and vowed to contest the seat, come rain or shine. We wait to see how it unfolds.
***
A prominent politician is seemingly having second thoughts about a major political alliance after discovering that his prospective partners may already have settled on another candidate for the top seat. We are told the leader had invested considerable time and resources building bridges, only to supposedly realise he could be used merely as a numbers machine. The discovery has triggered frantic consultations, with advisers now urging him to negotiate harder before committing his supporters to any coalition.
****
We recently told you about a county boss and a sophisticated diagnostic county referral hospital. Now, something does not quite add up in the story. Screenshots doing rounds on social media suggest the equipment was initially received as a donation, only for a later post to describe it as a multi-million purchase by the county. Critics are now demanding clarity on the procurement trail and the actual cost of the machine, said to be worth far less. Could someone explain the conflicting accounts?
