My no is not a mood swing / AI GENERATED

I learned about consent the same way Nairobi teaches you most lessons: loudly, suddenly and in public. One second I was squeezed into a matatu, knees knocking strangers’, gengetone blasting like the city’s heartbeat. The next, my phone lit up with a message from someone I’d danced with the night before in Westlands: “We already started something yesterday, so don’t switch up today.”

Outside the window, Nairobi slid by in a blur of boda bodas, hawkers and unfinished buildings. Inside me, something hardened. Since when did sharing a dance floor turn into owing someone access to my body? In a city where everything feels borrowed — space, time, patience — it turns out even your no can get treated like it’s negotiable.

Here’s the real talk we keep dodging: Consent isn’t a vibe, a look across the room or the fact that I laughed at your joke. It isn’t silence, and it definitely isn’t “you didn’t say no”.

Consent is a clear, enthusiastic, ongoing yes. It’s specific to what’s happening right now, and it can change halfway through. It’s mutual. It’s sober enough to be real. It’s the difference between guessing what someone wants and actually asking them. If that sounds like it might interrupt the moment, that’s because it’s meant to interrupt the parts of the moment that rely on pressure, assumptions or fear of seeming rude.

We like to think we are more ‘woke’ about these things as Gen Zs. We repost infographics about boundaries on Instagram. We drag toxic behaviour on TikTok. We use words like ‘bare minimum’ and ‘red flag’ fluently.

Enjoying this article? Subscribe for unlimited access to premium sports coverage.
View Plans

But offline, in the mess of real life, those ideas get shaky. There’s this pressure to be chill, to not be ‘that person’ who kills the mood. One of my friends, Jemimah Mukasa, 23, told me, “If you keep asking ‘are you okay with this?’ Utaonekana kama huna game.”

In the same breath, Nathan Kimani, 25, pushed back when we argued about it over fries at Sonford: “If your game depends on someone being too awkward to say no, that’s not game, it’s manipulation.”

I’ve tested both theories. The people who get annoyed when you check in? They’re telling you something important about themselves.

The pushback is real, though, and I don’t want to pretend it isn’t. A guy I went on a few dates with once said, “If you agree to come over at midnight, what am I supposed to think?” I wanted to tell him he’s supposed to think I want to talk, maybe just escape my noisy house for a bit.

The bigger issue isn’t about blaming individual guys or girls; it’s about the scripts we’ve inherited. Pop culture still romanticises persistence. If you ‘chase’, you’re confident. If you stop when someone hesitates, you’re weak. Those scripts don’t survive real life. They collapse the moment someone freezes because their body is saying no even when their mouth hasn’t caught up yet.

And this isn’t just feelings, it’s facts. Research consistently shows that people, especially young adults, misread nonverbal cues. Alcohol makes that worse, not better. Power dynamics matter. If someone is older, richer, more popular or literally the one with the car to take you home from Kilimani at 3am, your “choice” is already under pressure. Pretending consent is obvious ignores how messy human communication actually is.

I’ve also experienced consent done right, and it’s not awkward or robotic. It’s someone noticing when I go quiet and saying, “Hey, uko sawa?” It’s a pause when my body stiffens, not a push. It’s being okay with me changing my mind mid-moment because a song came on that reminded me of something heavy. The moments that stayed with me weren’t dramatic declarations; they were small acts of care that said my comfort wasn’t an inconvenience.

We also need to talk about consent outside bedrooms, because that’s where we practise respecting boundaries. Friends who post your photos from last night’s sherehe without asking. People who insist on hugging you even when you step back. Group chats that forward screenshots of private messages for laughs.

These small violations teach us that other people’s comfort is negotiable. Then we act surprised when bigger boundaries get crossed.

Some people worry that talking about consent turns intimacy into a checklist. My controversial take? Checklists can be sexy if what you’re checking for is mutual desire. “Is this okay?” can be whispered like a promise.

The romance isn’t in guessing right; it’s in choosing each other, clearly, in real time. Spontaneity doesn’t disappear when you ask. It just becomes shared.

So yeah, consent isn’t a vibe, and it’s not a mood killer either. It’s a practice. It’s something you rehearse in group chats, in clubs, in late-night walks home when someone wants more and you don’t. It’s choosing to ask even when you’re sure. It’s choosing to hear no without turning cold or cruel.

If Gen Zs are really about rewriting broken systems, then this is one of the scripts we have to burn and rewrite from scratch. Not online, not in captions, but in the awkward pauses, the honest questions, the moments where respect costs you a little ego. That’s where the real revolution is.